Bourgon, J. (2017). Re-thinking public innovation. ETHOS, 17, 82-88. Retreived from https://www.csc.gov.sg/docs/default-source/ethos/ethos17.pdf [1]

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (n.d.). Carnegie Community Engagement Classification. Retrieved from https://compact.org/initiatives/carnegie-community-engagement-classification/ [2]

Gordon da Cruz, C. (2017). Critical community-engaged scholarship: Communities and universities striving for racial justice. Peabody Journal of Education, 92, 363-384.

Jordan, C. (Editor) (2007). Community-Engaged Scholarship Review, Promotion & Tenure Package. Peer Review Workgroup, Community-Engaged Scholarship for Health Collaborative, Community-Campus Partnerships for Health. Complete document available at  https://www.ccphealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/CES_RPT_Package.pdf [3]

*The characteristics of quality community-engaged scholarship are drawn and adapted from these sources: Portland State University Promotion and Tenure guidelines, University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine Promotion and Tenure guidelines, National Review Board for the Scholarship of Engagement guidelines, and Glassick C, Huber M and Maeroff G, Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1997.

Nelson, G. Ochocka, J., Griffin, K. & Lord, J. (1998). “Nothing about me without me”: Participatory action research with self-help/mutual aid organizations for psychiatric consumer/survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26, 881-912.

Social Science and Humanities Research Council (2010). Community Engagement and Knowledge Mobilization. Retrieved from http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/society-societe/community-communite/index-eng.aspx [4]